Application process for BBC News Channel roles was ‘rigged’, presenters tell tribunal

In their witness statements, which appear to be similar, the women said: “I am one of five female chief presenters with BBC News, aged 48 to 54, at the time of the detriments, who have suffered (direct/indirect) discrimination on the grounds of age and sex victimisation for union rep activities, victimisation for carrying out protected acts (bringing equal pay claims), harassment (violation of dignity, creation of a hostile, degrading, intimidating environment in the workplace, causing us to suffer ill-health and reputational damage).

“This was because of a sham recruitment exercise where our jobs were closed even though the redundancies were not genuine as the work still exists.”

The BBC is resisting the women’s legal claim in which they allege they lost their jobs and were kept off air for a year when they challenged the process.

The women alleged they have been left to suffer victimisation, harassment and reputational damage.

Their witness statements add: “Four of us have been demoted, three are facing a sizeable pay cut, with a fourth having had her pay cut for half of her job.

“No men and no women younger than us suffered these detriments.”

The women applied for the new roles as BBC News chief presenters but lost out to successful applicants including Matthew Amroliwala.

In their tribunal claim, the women said a manager had told union reps in consultation meetings that new lower paid correspondent-presenter jobs were intended as development opportunities, meaning they were for people with less experience than them.

They also said the cuts have left the new channel understaffed and that director-general Tim Davie had said publicly on several occasions he wanted far fewer presenters.

The women believed they have not been paid equally compared with their male counterparts since February 2020 and there was a gap of about £36,000 a year in pensionable salary as of February 2023.

They described themselves as having been “set up to fail in the jobs process” which saw them being denied work while less experienced freelances and casuals have covered shifts they could have done.

Being kept off the air happened against their will and took place amid press and social media speculation about their futures to which they had right of reply, they added.

The stress of the “bogus” process, a year of uncertainty and publicity about their careers has caused distress and has affected their health, they said. The BBC has denied the claims.

Who are Martine Croxall, Karin Giannone, Kasia Madera and Annita McVeigh?

Croxall, who has worked for the BBC since October 1991, has been a chief presenter with the BBC News Channel and BBC World News since 2001. She has also appeared on BBC One network news bulletins.

Madera has worked for the BBC since July 2022. Since March 2012, she has been a chief presenter with the BBC News Channel and BBC World News and also appeared on BBC One network news bulletins.

She described her work as “a huge part of who I am and I am very proud to work for BBC News”.

McVeigh, who has worked for the BBC since October 1995, has been a chief presenter with the BBC News Channel and BBC World News, since 2006. She has also appeared on BBC network news. McVeigh was appointed as a chief presenter on the BBC News Channel in a second round of appointments in February, alongside Ben Brown and Geeta Guru-Murthy.

Giannone starting working for the BBC in January 2005. She became a permanent staff member in April 2008 and has been a chief presenter on BBC World News and the BBC News Channel.

Equal pay claim not allowed by tribunal judge

Update: On Thursday employment judge Sarah Goodman concluded that the women, who had previously reached settlements with the BBC, could not bring new equal pay claims as part of the tribunal.

The women believe they have not been paid equally compared with their male counterparts since February 2020.

Lawyers for the BBC had described the equal pay part of the claim as being like “seeking a second bite of the cherry on the same set of facts”.

The BBC insists its application process was “rigorous and fair” and also denied the claims that the four women were paid less than an equivalent male colleague, according to the corporation’s website.

After the hearing a BBC spokesperson said: “We are pleased with the result and that the tribunal has accepted our position.” It is believed that the BBC’s position is that it has complied with equal pay legislation.

All four journalists are expected to give evidence during their full employment tribunal against the BBC, which was set for three weeks from 17 March next year. They were given the go-ahead to have their cases heard jointly as part of the preliminary hearing.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog