Horoscope
The 17th century £21,000,000 diamond at the heart of a royal family court battle
A royal family feud over a prized diamond which could be worth up to £21 million is set to be thrashed out at the High Court.
Rival members of Qatar’s multi-billionaire Al-Thani dynaysty are fighting over the Idol’s Eye, said to be world’s largest cut blue diamond.
The 17th-century, 70 carat gemstone, found in India in 1600, was once owned by a Sultan of the Ottoman Empire and after WW2 was set as the pendant to a necklace containing 86 other diamonds.
It is now in the London home of the late Qatari culture minister Sheikh Saoud bin Mohammed Ali Al-Thani, who bought the stone in the early 2000s and died in 2014.
Shortly before his death, he lent the Idol’s Eye to Qipco, an investment company owned by art collector Sheikh Hamad bin Abdullah Al Thani, a cousin of Qatar’s ruler.
Sheikh Hamad bin Abdullah – whose $400m Mayfair home Dudley House is reportedly Britain’s most expensive private residence – claims he has the right to buy the stone for US$ 10million (about £7.8m).
The loan agreement is said to have given him the option to buy it with the consent of Elanus Holdings, a company handling the estate of the widow and children of the late Sheikh Saoud.
The two sides disagree over how much the stone is worth and whether there was ever an agreement to sell it.
Qipco claims the sale process was kicked off in 2020 with a letter from Elanus’ Swiss solicitor.
It stated: ‘I just learned from Sheikh Hamad, the son of the late Sheikh Saoud Al Thani, that the family would like to sell the Idol’s Eye.’
Qipco claims it continued with the process but that the late Sheikh’s family went back on the offer, which wasn’t allowed under the loan agreement.
It’s asking the court to order Elanus to sell the diamond for $10 million, which is the upper end of a previous valuation by Christie’s.
Latest London news
To get the latest news from the capital visit Metro’s London news hub.
Elanus’ lawyers say it was a ‘mistake’ to take the letter as an offer to sell, arguing it didn’t state the company’s ‘wish’ to get rid of the diamond.
‘Although the 6 February letter said that the family wished to sell the Idol’s Eye, they did not,’ the High Court was told.
‘Indeed, they had not even discussed or considered it.
‘As for Elanus and its ultimate beneficial owner, the Foundation, they had not even been consulted, let alone formed any “wish”.’
Elanus said the letter was sent after the late Sheikh’s son had thoughts about selling the diamond to fund property deals.
It’s also arguing the gem could be worth far more than $10 million, citing an Elanus diamond expert’s valuation of £21 million.
Qipco’s lawyer said Elanus had in fact become ‘fixed with the wish to sell’ and that their Swiss solicitor had ‘clear’ authority to send the letter.
The solicitor had an ‘unambiguous instruction’ to write ‘a formal letter as the representative of Elanus informing Qipco that we wish to sell the Idol’s Eye’, the lawyer argued.
Qipco argued the higher valuation by Elanus’ diamond expert was just an attempt to raise the sale price.
The hearing continues.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: LGBT+ church leader arrested after Metro investigation into ‘sexual abuse’
MORE: US government confirms existence of 21 unexplainable UFO sightings
MORE: Map shows scale of Russia’s latest missile onslaught on Ukraine